United States v. Joseph Pinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a search based on infrared imaging results, comparatively high electricity consumption, and the receipt of packages from a manufacturer of hydroponic growing equipment
• explaining that Rule 9(b) “applies to civil RICO fraud 25 claims”
• “[j]ust as odor escapes a compartment or building and is detected by the sense-enhancing instrument of a canine sniff, so also does heat escape a home and is detected by the sense-enhancing infrared camera”
• “A premature decision on summary judgment impermissibly 25 deprives the [defendants] of their right to utilize the discovery process to discover the facts 26 necessary to justify their opposition to the motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).