United States v. Joseph Obiukwu (92-2051) and Thomas Glenn (92-2120)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he fact that the district court saw fit to rule on the merits of [the] motion, despite its untimeliness, does not save the defendant from waiver of the grounds stated in the motion”
• holding that Rule 12(b)(3)(C) and (e) applies to identification testimony in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).