Skip to main content
· 10/8/2003

United States v. Joseph Michael Amatel

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 278
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20432
  • 2003 WL 22299055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Jones stands alone and that every case decided since Jones has affirmed the legality of petitions by probation officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Katzmann, Raggi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.