United States v. Joseph Louis Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion where the court allowed the Government to reopen the record and present evidence “inadvertently omitted from the case in chief’
• appellant’s employer gave written consent to search van belonging to employer and driven by appellant for work purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).