Skip to main content
· 8/26/1976

United States v. Joseph L. Gallo

Citations

  • 543 F.2d 361
  • 177 U.S. App. D.C. 214
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “holding that the jury may conclude from circumstantial evidence that an accused possessed the requisite knowledge for the statutory offense”
  • knowledge that goods are stolen may be inferred from willingness to buy or sell at a price substantially less than market value
  • knowledge that goods are stolen may be inferred from willingness to buy or sell at a price substantially less than market value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, MacKinnon, Weigel, Northern, California

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.