United States v. Joseph Jackson McGill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, although whether a defendant was released pursuant to the Bail Reform Act may involve both law and fact issues, “the authority by which a judge released a defendant and whether the court complied with statutory procedures are primarily questions of law”
• explaining that, although whether a defendant was released pursuant to the Bail Reform Act may involve both law and fact issues, “the authority by which a judge released a defendant and whether the court complied with statutory procedures are primarily questions of law”
• rejecting defendant’s argument that his release was not pursuant to the Bail Reform Act because “the court did not repeatedly tell him he was continued on bond and did not amend the original order of release each time”
• rejecting defendant’s argument that his release was not pursuant to the Bail Reform Act because “the court did not repeatedly tell him he was continued on bond and did not amend the original order of release each time”
• to prove defendant guilty of violating § 3150 in jury case, government required to prove defendant was released pursuant to statute, was required to appear in court, knew that he was required to appear, and was willful in failure to appear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).