United States v. Joseph Iacullo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Fourth Amendment violation where fingerprints were taken after a valid arrest and were used to compare with fingerprints on newspapers used to wrap narcotics
• “[Defendant’s] constitutional rights were not violated when his fingerprints were taken and at the trial used as a basis for comparison with 1972 HASKELL v. HARRIS fingerprints found on newspapers used to wrap narcotics.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).