Skip to main content
· 9/26/2003

United States v. Joseph Griffith

Citations

  • 344 F.3d 714
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19807
  • 2003 WL 22220371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an upward adjustment may be inadequate to address the degree of sexual exploitation
  • explaining that the particularly horrific nature of defendant’s images justified a sentence above guidelines range
  • upholding upward departure based on defendant’s two prior convictions for sexual abuse of children and his three failed attempts to complete treatment for sex offenders
  • discussing the effect of the PROTECT Act on a district court’s decision to upward depart
  • affirming upward departure in sentence for pornography distribution where defendant’s photographs were the worst the judge had seen in 35-year legal career and defendant posed serious risk of future dangerousness
  • discussing effect of PROTECT Act on district court’s decision to upward depart

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.