United States v. Joseph F. Hornbeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it irrelevant whether a warrant “was void under tribal law due to the failure to timely file the return and provide [the defendant] with an inventory of property seized”
• finding it irrelevant whether a warrant “was void under tribal law due to the failure to timely file the return and provide [the defendant] with an inventory of property seized”
• rejecting argument that evidence was subject to exclusionary rule because tribal law was violated
• failure to timely file return and provide defendant with inventory of property seized, in violation of tribal law, did not require suppression
• “Federal, not tribal or state, law governs the admissibility of evidence” in the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).