Skip to main content
· 9/25/1981

United States v. Joseph E. Shamy

Citations

  • 656 F.2d 951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, in mail fraud investigation — in the words of Judge Haynsworth — “large sums of money, and the manner in which those funds were acquired were highly relevant to proof of the scheme to defraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haynsworth, Phillips, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.