Skip to main content
· 3/30/1995

United States v. Joseph D. Fones

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 663
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6421
  • 1995 WL 137041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the enhancement did not apply where the district court found defendant did not have control over any other participants
  • holding that § 3B1.1 enhancement was improperly applied where defendant lacked control of or authority over another partici- pant
  • finding that application note , to § 3B1.1 was clarifying rather than substantive
  • “[Tjhis note now requires that a defendant have control over at least one participant of the criminal activity in order to be subject to a sentencing enhancement under § 3B1.1.”
  • explaining “control over at least one other participant” is required
  • explaining “control over at least one other participant” is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.