· 3/30/1995
United States v. Joseph D. Fones
Citations
- 51 F.3d 663
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6421
- 1995 WL 137041
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the enhancement did not apply where the district court found defendant did not have control over any other participants
- holding that § 3B1.1 enhancement was improperly applied where defendant lacked control of or authority over another partici- pant
- finding that application note , to § 3B1.1 was clarifying rather than substantive
- “[Tjhis note now requires that a defendant have control over at least one participant of the criminal activity in order to be subject to a sentencing enhancement under § 3B1.1.”
- explaining “control over at least one other participant” is required
- explaining “control over at least one other participant” is required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.