United States v. Joseph Coffey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no constitutional violation where alleged misconduct was isolated and not intentional, the trial court provided curative instructions and trial evidence demonstrated defendant’s guilt
• “[T]he ‘money had and received’ claim arises out of 19 Palka’s alleged overpayment of himself which allegedly occurred during June 1984 while Palka was physically present in California.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).