Skip to main content
· 1/29/1992

United States v. Joseph C. Kane

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 110
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1104
  • 1992 WL 12066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Supreme Court authority restricting Cohen appeals in criminal cases to three narrow categories: refusals to dismiss indictments for violations of double jeopardy clause or speech and debate clause or to reduce bail
  • noting <br>Supreme Court authority restricting Cohen appeals in criminal cases <br>to three narrow categories: refusals to dismiss indictments for <br>violations of double jeopardy clause or speech and debate clause or <br>to reduce bail
  • “As a result of the ‘compelling interest in prompt trials,’ the requirements of the collateral order doctrine have been interpreted ‘with the utmost strictness’ in criminal prosecutions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Campbell, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.