United States v. Joseph Bryant, John Cagnina, Terry Lee Alvarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court’s method of exercising peremp- tory challenges constituted no error even though an alternative procedure would have been the “better practice”
• concluding the district court’s jury-selection procedure constituted no abuse of USCA11 Case: 21-10079 Date Filed: 02/10/2022 Page: 6 of 8 6 Opinion of the Court 21-10079 discretion in part because the district court provided advance no- tice of the challenged procedure and no party objected
• finding no basis for defenant’s claim of prejudice in joint peremptory challenge procedure where “[c]ounsel were informed prior to the beginning of voir dire of the procedure to be used and voiced no objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).