Skip to main content
· 7/26/2002

United States v. Joseph B. Sprofera, Also Known as Old Man Joe, Also Known as One-Eyed Joe, Also Known as Dago Joe

Citations

  • 299 F.3d 725
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14986
  • 2002 WL 1726817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a finding that dismissal is contrary to manifest public interest is “determined by whether the prosecutor’s motion to dismiss was made in bad faith”
  • no bad faith where government dismissed three of four counts on first day of trial to streamline case
  • “[T]he district court had to grant the motion unless the dismissal would be clearly contrary to manifest public interest. . . .” (quotation omitted)
  • 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846 are not facially unconstitutional in light of Apprendi and sentence is valid “so long as there is no Apprendi violation in the course of its implementation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Arnold, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.