Skip to main content
· 9/18/1985

United States v. Joseph Arnold and Joseph Grieco

Citations

  • 773 F.2d 823
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 1000
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence of defendants’ loan sharking activities admissible to show motive for bribery of witness before grand jury investigating loansharking
  • “[T]he length of time elapsed since the commission of the prior act is not per se determinative of its admissibility under Rule 404(b).”
  • “The similarity of the prior conversation concerning witness bribery to the present offense and its probative value, not the time of occurrence, determines whether it is admissible under Rule 404(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.