United States v. Joseph Aracri, John Papandon, and Anthony Zummo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that separate criminal acts may be charged in a single count if they are part of “a single continuing scheme”
• “[I]t is well 19 established that the allegation in a single count of a conspiracy to 20 commit several crimes is not duplicitous, for the conspiracy is the 21 crime and that is one, however diverse its objects.” (alterations and 22 internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).