United States v. Joseph A. Kirschenbaum, A/K/A Ari Kirschenbaum, Appeal Of: Julie Kirschenbaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in general, due process claims are reviewed de novo
• where a nonparty has been enjoined, “[t]he core of due process is the right to notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard”
• “[N] on-parties who are bound by a court’s equitable decrees have a right to move to have the order dissolved.”
• defendant’s wife, a nonparty who did not intervene in the trial court, had standing to appeal an injunction that froze assets in her name
• due process prohibits restraining funds without a hearing if the defendant can show a bona fide need to use the funds to obtain counsel
• both applying Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100, 110–11 (1969)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).