United States v. Josef John Casal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because defendant talked coherently and did not appear to be intoxicated, there was no error
• explaining that because defendant talked coherently and did not appear to be intoxicated, there was -4- no error
• noting that “intoxication and fatigue do not automatically render a confession involuntary”
• lack of evidence of impairment and demonstrated ability to say “no” to police showed volun-tariness
• suspect not coerced by knowledge that pregnant girlfriend was in custody when police had legitimate reason to take her to station and did not threaten him in respect to her or recruit her to persuade him to confess
• suspect not coerced by knowledge that pregnant girlfriend was in custody when police had legitimate reason to take her to station and did not threaten him in respect to her or recruit her to persuade him to confess

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).