United States v. Jose Toribio-Lugo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he implication of consent is not lightly to be indulged.”
• “[D]ouble jeopardy principles require that a defendant retain primary control over whether or not to abort an Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-CR-959 | June 2, 2026 Page 23 of 34 ongoing trial.” (citing United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 609 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).