United States v. Jose Rafael Perez-Franco, United States v. Jose Luis Leon-Urena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying bail to defendants charged with violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(i) and 846, in part because although they did not have a prior criminal record, they faced serious consequences as a result of the charges
• no evidence that a home confinement monitoring bracelet is readily available or workable
• district court did not err in refusing to release defendant pursuant to proposed conditions: among other things, defendant had proposed that the homes of his relatives be posted as security, but presented no evidence that family was willing to do so
• district court did not err in refusing to release defendant pursuant to proposed conditions: among other things, defendant had proposed that the homes of his relatives be posted as security, but presented no evidence that family was willing to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).