United States v. Jose Mata-Peres, United States of America v. Felix Luna-Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \Congress plainly intended the [CAA] and 16 regulations promulgated thereunder to take precedence over state laws and 17 regulations\
• alleging error based on the district court’s statement, “lack of criminal history is taken into account in the defendant’s criminal history and, therefore, something that’s taken into account in the criminal history isn’t a proper basis for a variance”
• alleging error based on the district court’s statement, “lack of criminal history is taken into account in the defendant’s criminal history and, therefore, something that’s taken into account in the criminal history isn’t a proper basis for a variance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).