United States v. Jose Marquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a two- 2 Case: 21-51161 Document: 00516488326 Page: 3 Date Filed: 09/28/2022 No. 21-51161 level increase under § 2D1.1(b)(1) even though the firearm was never found
• “Marquez simply focuses on the district court’s errors independent of any prejudice they may have caused”
• first quoting United States v. Hooten, 942 F.2d 878, 882 (5th Cir. 1991); and then quoting United States v. Stallings, 463 F.3d 1218, 1220 (11th Cir. 2006)
• “Marquez has the burden of showing that these procedural defects affected his substantial rights.”
• “These procedures are not empty formalities.”
• “These procedures are not empty formalities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).