United States v. Jose Manuel Anaya-Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentencing court need not address an unwarranted-disparities argument unless the defendant provides a \sufficient evidentiary showing\ that his situation is comparable to defendants who received a lower sentence
• holding that a sentencing court need not address an unwarranted‐disparities argument unless the defendant pro‐ vides a “sufficient evidentiary showing” that his situation is comparable to defendants who received a lower sentence
• holding that a sentencing court need not address an unwarranted‐disparities argument unless the defendant pro‐ vides a “sufficient evidentiary showing” that his situation is comparable to defendants who received a lower sentence
• “When a party seeks to estop the government, the party must also show that the government committed affirmative misconduct, which re- quires ‘more than mere negligence.’” (citation omitted)
• “When a party seeks to estop the government, the party must also show that the government committed affirmative misconduct, which requires ‘more than mere negligence.’ ” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).