Skip to main content
· 4/19/2002

United States v. Jose M. Castillo, A/K/A Richard Lara, A/K/A Daniel

Citations

  • 287 F.3d 21
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7215
  • 2002 WL 562825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that affiant had not recklessly omitted negative field test of substance seized from defendant’s building when he “offer[ed] no evidence ... that the negative field test had already been performed”
  • finding no material omission where the omitted information would have strengthened probable cause
  • “With an omission, the inquiry is whether its inclusion in an affidavit would have led to a negative finding by the magistrate on probable cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Lipez, Singal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.