United States v. Jose Luis Lozada-Rivera A/K/A Sealed 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the admission of statements concerning subornation of perjury was not harmless error and required reversal and a new trial
• finding that the admission of statements concerning subornation of perjury was not harmless error and required reversal and a new trial
• giving “deference to the trial court’s finding as to whether counsel has implied during questioning that a witness has a motive to fabricate”
• report of DEA case agent amounted to a “ ‘condensation of the government’s whole case against the defendant’ ” and was erroneously admitted as an exhibit and given to jury during deliberations
• “[T]he proponent of evidence must point to specific questions during his adversary’s examination that suggest recent fabrication or bias. Merely appealing to credibility as a live issue will not do the trick.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).