United States v. Jose Juan Ramirez-Robles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because Rule 403 and Daubert act independently, reviewing court need not consider trial court’s application of Daubert if evidence was properly excluded under Rule 403
• holding under Rule 404(b) that evidence of the defendant’s prior conduct was not “too remote” because it occurred three or four years before “the charged conduct”
• affirming the exclusion of polygraph tests under Rule 403 given the “significance of [the questions] to the case . . . when combined with the powerful persuasive power of polygraph testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).