Skip to main content
· 8/21/1991

United States v. Jose Juan Lamela, United States of America v. James David Lamela

Citations

  • 942 F.2d 100
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19469
  • 1991 WL 159095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming reasonable suspicion where defendant provided \inconsistent responses to routine questions relating to the purpose of his travel\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Cyr, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.