United States v. Jose Jesus Madrigal, Also Known as Fat Boy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[s]tatements of a coconspirator identifying a fellow coconspirator as his source of controlled substances [are] in furtherance of the conspiracy and therefore admissible\
• affirming the district court's refusal to conduct an in camera inspection where the defendant failed to provide a \basis for his belief that the notes contain 'statements' as defined in the Jencks Act\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).