United States v. Jose Garcia Sota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that this state has adopted the standards from Strickland v. Wash., 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)
• acknowledging that Washington has adopted the standards from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 14 No. 34478-9-III State v. Gonzalez-Hernandez 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)
• relying on “increased protection of jury trials under the Washington Constitution” to uphold finding of prima facie case of discrimination under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1986)
• defense counsel deficient for informing the jury that the case was noncapital and failing to object when the trial court and prosecution made similar references

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).