Skip to main content
· 5/3/2006

United States v. Jose D. Florez

Citations

  • 447 F.3d 145
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11186
  • 2006 WL 1174135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a defendant who maintained his innocence and went to trial is dissimilarly situated to a codefendant who pled guilty
  • affirming court’s finding that defendant was responsible for “upwards of 16 kilos” of heroin, even though jury found defendant responsible for between three and ten kilograms
  • law enforcement sought defendant at various locations, and spoke with family, coworkers, and friends
  • “We will not attempt to second-guess a jury’s credibility determination on a sufficiency challenge.”
  • “We will not attempt to second-guess a jury’s credibility determination on a sufficiency challenge.”
  • “[T]he weight to be given [sentencing] disparities, like the weight to be given any § 3553(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Raggi, Restani, Trade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.