· 5/3/2006
United States v. Jose D. Florez
Citations
- 447 F.3d 145
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11186
- 2006 WL 1174135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a defendant who maintained his innocence and went to trial is dissimilarly situated to a codefendant who pled guilty
- affirming court’s finding that defendant was responsible for “upwards of 16 kilos” of heroin, even though jury found defendant responsible for between three and ten kilograms
- law enforcement sought defendant at various locations, and spoke with family, coworkers, and friends
- “We will not attempt to second-guess a jury’s credibility determination on a sufficiency challenge.”
- “We will not attempt to second-guess a jury’s credibility determination on a sufficiency challenge.”
- “[T]he weight to be given [sentencing] disparities, like the weight to be given any § 3553(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Raggi, Restani, Trade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.