United States v. Jose Bernardo Barragan, Terran Hober Luis Carabaio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government’s Rule 16(a) violation was harmless because the defendant’s “participation and role in the crime were clearly established” by other evidence at trial
• excluding period of continuance where court “never explicitly ruled on” continuance motion, but “in effect granted the requested continuance” on basis of essential-witness exclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).