United States v. Jose Arambula-Ruiz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding error in admitting evidence was “harmless because it is not probable that the evidence materially affected the jurors’ verdict”
• holding error in admitting evidence was “harmless because it is not probable that the evidence materially affected the jurors’ verdict”
• explaining that “an appropriate instruction limiting the purpose for which the jury could consider evidence of a defendant’s prior conviction” is a factor weighing in favor of admission of Rule 404(b) evidence
• “[T]he fact that [the defendant] was convicted of the prior drug offense is sufficient proof that the defendant committed the prior act.”
• “[T]he fact that [the defendant] was convicted of the prior drug offense is sufficient proof that the defendant committed the prior act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).