Skip to main content
· 12/5/1991

United States v. Jose Antonio Herrera

Citations

  • 948 F.2d 1046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[G]iven the district court’s express reliance on the government’s analysis of the offense contained in the presentence report, any error committed by referring to [a codefendant’s] sentencing hearing was harmless at best.”
  • “[G]iven the district court’s express reliance on the government’s analysis of the offense contained in the presentence report, any error committed by referring to [a codefendant’s] sentencing hearing was harmless at best.”
  • “[G]iven the district court’s express reliance on the government’s analysis of the offense contained in the presentence report, any error committed by referring to [a codefendant’s] sentencing hearing was harmless at best.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Kanne, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.