United States v. Jose Alvarado-Pineda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, because specific intent to steal is an element of the Washington robbery statute, it falls within the definition of generic theft
• articulating that “the removal order serves as a predicate element of [the defendant’s] conviction”
• discussing waiver and U-visa as forms of relief from which aggravated felons are not barred when applying for admission to the U.S.
• “fundamental unfairness” under § 1326(d)(3) requires proof of a due process violation and resulting prejudice
• “As a general matter, a defendant who has been convicted of an aggravated felony cannot show that he was prejudiced by defects in his underlying proceedings.”
• looking to Washington statutes and cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).