United States v. Jorge Serna and Steven John Cinnante

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proffered expert’s testimony did not relate to conditions under which witness made identification and many of his conclusions coincided with common sense
• reviewing decision to exclude expert testimony for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).