United States v. Jorge McLauling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• as long as expert’s testimony rests upon “good grounds, based on what is known” it should be tested by adversary process with competing expert testimony and cross-examination, rather than excluded by court at outset

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).