United States v. Jorge L. Reyes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that audita querela not available to vacate conviction on general equitable grounds
• declining to apply Burnside in a criminal case \because [defendant's] motions pray for the vacation of a criminal conviction rather than a civil judgment and are not ordinary Rule 60(b) motions\
• stating that “the Salgado and Ghebreziabher courts had strayed from the original bounds of the writ” and that such use of the writ “usurp[ed] the power of Congress to set naturalization and deportation standards and the power of the INS to administer those standards”
• stating that \the Salgado and Ghebreziabher courts had strayed from the original bounds of the writ\ and that such use of the writ \usurp[ed] the power of Congress to set naturalization and deportation standards and the power of the INS to administer those standards\
• stating that allowing the writ “to vacate a Rule 60(b
• comparing the Black’s Law definitions of audita querela and coram nobis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).