United States v. Jorge Humberto Diaz-Lizaraza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, where the district court issued a limiting instruction, “any unfair prejudice possibly caused by [the evidence’s] introduction was mitigated”
• explaining that “[d]uring a Terry stop, officers may ask a suspect to identify himself or herself” and concluding that “the agents’ request for identification and basic personal information was reasonable”
• noting that, where the district court issued a limiting instruction both at the presentation of the evidence and in its final charge to the jury, “any unfair prejudice possibly caused by its introduction was mitigated”
• noting that, where the district court issued a lim- iting instruction both at the presentation of the evidence and in its final charge to the jury, “any unfair prejudice possibly caused by its introduction was mitigated”
• noting that, where the district USCA11 Case: 22-11802 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 07/13/2023 Page: 6 of 14 6 Opinion of the Court 22-11802 court issued a limiting instruction, “any unfair prejudice possibly caused by [the evidence’s] introduction was mitigated”
• finding where the district court issued a limiting instruction, “any unfair prejudice possibly caused by its introduction was miti- gated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).