Skip to main content
· 4/23/1980

United States v. Jorge Francisco Lagarda-Aguilar

Citations

  • 617 F.2d 527
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the “requirement of written notice is the only safeguard . . . . [W]ritten notice is essential to effectuate a termination”
  • termination of parole should not be left to the “whim” of INS agents; written notice is a “safeguard” to the orderly administration of parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merrill, Tang, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.