United States v. Jonathan Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a risk of unfair prejudice exists where the evidence might lead the jury to “punish” the government’s witness for “misconduct” rather than assess the evidence against the defendant
• affirming exclusion of evidence under Rule 403 where the district court “did not completely close the door on the possibility of allowing the jury to hear” about the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Jonathan Woods

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Jonathan Woods
  Eighth Circuit· 2022-08-31