United States v. Jonathan Wayne Larrabee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a fifty-four percent upward variance in part because recent amendments to the guidelines would have put the sentence in the amended guidelines range
• affirming a fifty-four percent upward variance in part because the sentence would be in the amended Guidelines range
• affirming 54 percent upward variance because of the brutality of the killing, the failure to call for help, and the defendant’s significant criminal history
• affirming a fifty-four percent upward variance in part because the sentence would be in the amended Guidelines range
• affirming a fifty-four percent upward variance in part because recent amendments to the guidelines would have put the sentence in the amended guidelines range
• holding a fifty-four percent variance extraordinary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).