United States v. Jonathan Grenon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a “putative class [was] too overinclusive to ensure commonality” where “some class members may lack any . . . claim against [the defendant],” such that “no question of law or fact [would be] common with these individuals” (emphasis added)
• rejecting a class certification analysis that relies solely on the allegation that class members “are unified by a common theory of being worked off the clock, regardless of the specific uncompensated activities they were required to perform”
• “[N]ebulous references to ‘systemic failures’ or ‘systemic deficiencies’ to satisfy commonality” often “mask a multitude of disparities” within the class.
• “[N]ebulous references to ‘systemic failures’ or ‘systemic deficiencies’ to satisfy commonality” often “mask a multitude of disparities” within the class.
• “[N]ebulous references to ‘systemic failures’ or ‘systemic deficiencies’ to satisfy commonality” often “mask a multitude of disparities” within the class.
• “Allegations of generalized policies are not usually sufficient for the purposes of class certification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).