United States v. Jonathan Boyd and Robert Keith Powell, Jonathan L. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that destruction of urine sample did not pose due process violation where probationer could raise other challenges to evidence, including reliability of test results
• holding no due process violation based on routine destruction of urine specimen prior to defendant's ability to independently test it where defendant \had other means by which to challenge the evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).