United States v. Jomar Michlin, United States of America v. Rahsaan Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plea colloquy pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 is not a prerequisite for a valid waiver of appellate rights when a plea agreement expressly waives the appellate rights
• holding that the defendant’s appellate waiver was effective because he “failed to show that his plea was not knowing and voluntary”
• holding that the defendant’s appellate waiver was 1 effective because he “failed to show that his plea was not knowing and voluntary”
• dismissing appeal of the district court's denial of defendants' motion to withdraw their guilty pleas because defendants had waived the right to appeal their convictions
• finding harmless error in failing to inquire about prior negotiations under Federal Rule 11(d)
• waiver of right to appeal conviction also precludes appeal of denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).