United States v. Johnny Neal, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conducting a two-part futility analysis reviewing both 6 exhaustion of state court remedies and the merits of the proposed claim
• discussing this danger in the context of a custom license 6 plate program
• “We must bear [the eyewitness testimony] in mind while assessing the probable effect of other undisclosed information”
• “We do not agree that this statement made the transcript material and so mandated disclosure .... Beanie’s statement ... is itself not decisive”
• “Rather than reviewing the alleged Brady materials in the abstract, we will examine the evidence presented at trial and how the extra materials would have fit”
• \We do not agree that this statement made the transcript material and so mandated disclosure . . . . Beanie's statement . . . is itself not decisive\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).