United States v. Johnny J. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no unanimity instruction was required where “the indictment charged not multiple offenses under one count of being a felon in 2 Anguiano found three situations in which the possibility of juror confusion may require a unanimity instruction: (1
• explaining that jury unanimity might be a concern if indictment alleges two crimes in single count
• holding juror unanimity as to the precise moment of possession was not necessary where there was no evidence the defendant lost possession of the weapon during a three-day period
• \[p]ossession of a firearm is a continuing offense which ceases 17 only when the possession stops\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).