Sixth Circuit· 3/16/1993

United States v. Johnny Franklin Patrick

Citations

988 F.2d 641
1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4676
1993 WL 69511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that there was no prejudice where “it [wa]s difficult to see what evidence or arguments such a disclosure would have prompted [the defendant] to offer”
finding that because cumulative evidence existed, the defendant “was presumably prepared” and “already had an adequate incentive to present any evidence or arguments he could”
holding under similar circumstances that the district court’s reliance “on matters outside the record constitute[d] harmless error”
suggesting that the district court erred in “failing] to provide advance notice of its intention to rely on matters outside the record”
explaining that a district court might provide reasonable notice simply by giving notice at the sentencing hearing
holding under similar circumstances that the district court’s reliance “on matters outside the record constitute[d] harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Suhrheinrich, Engel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.