United States v. Johnny Franklin Patrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no prejudice where “it [wa]s difficult to see what evidence or arguments such a disclosure would have prompted [the defendant] to offer”
• finding that because cumulative evidence existed, the defendant “was presumably prepared” and “already had an adequate incentive to present any evidence or arguments he could”
• holding under similar circumstances that the district court’s reliance “on matters outside the record constitute[d] harmless error”
• suggesting that the district court erred in “failing] to provide advance notice of its intention to rely on matters outside the record”
• explaining that a district court might provide reasonable notice simply by giving notice at the sentencing hearing
• holding under similar circumstances that the district court’s reliance “on matters outside the record constitute[d] harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).