Skip to main content
· 4/21/2003

United States v. Johnny Etimani, United States of America v. Johnny Etimani

Citations

  • 328 F.3d 493
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3274
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 4200
  • 61 Fed. R. Serv. 182
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the record did not estab- lish that a prior conviction was for a “sexual act” for purposes of the 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c
  • applying the modified categorical approach when the crime of conviction only required a \sexual act\ whereas the generic crime required \sexual contact\
  • applying the modified categorical approach when the crime of conviction only required a “sexual act” whereas the generic crime required “sexual contact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silverman, Gould, Sedwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.