United States v. Johnny Barbour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We are convinced that placing the burden on the government [for the purposes of a separate-offense inquiry] is the view shared by all our sister circuits that have squarely addressed the issue[.]”
• “The [ACCA] is phrased as requiring that, in order to qualify [as predicate offenses], offenses must be committed on occasions different from one another, rather than excluding from counting crimes committed on the same occasion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).